Search for: "Lloyd E. Powell"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2010, 8:34 pm
Powell are alive. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Shipler, Mtangulizi Sanyika, William E. [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Powell Aaron E. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:13 pm
Lloyd Jassin (www.copylaw.org) [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
On Tuesday 17 December 2013, the Court Martial Appeal Court (Lord Chief Justice, Tugendhat and Holroyde JJ) will give judgment in the case of R v Marines A to E. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Higgins and Craig E. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 4:58 pm
If you are a specialist and would like to be added to our list please e-mail me your contact information at [Robert@dioriofirm.com] The Law Offices of Robert A. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 7:03 pm
He can be reached at 610-258-7171 or by e-mail at tnauroth@express-times.comThe Associated Press contributed to this report. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
He can be reached at 610-258-7171 or by e-mail at tnauroth@express-times.com. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
Powell III of Richmond, Va.'s Hunton & Williams, did not return calls for comment. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
The Panopticon blog has a post on the recent CJEU decision in the case of Peterson v Google LLC C-682/18 and C-683/18 – a copyright case which deals with the protections given hosting platforms by the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• Michael E. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel erred under SEC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Hodson, Gary E. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, LondonDocket: 09-945Issue(s): Whether Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti-preemption provision of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replySupplemental brief for petitioner Title: Hogan v. [read post]
